 |
And a disproportionally large bloody pulpit whilst tooling
down Nostalgia Lane:
-
John & Adele Hopkins took one of my very first wine appreciation classes,
ca. 1973. I'd like to take credit for teaching them all they know about
wine, but, alas, I was only a catalyst. They've been taking far, far too
many data points out on their own since then. Back in that time frame,
my group was buying a fair amount of wines, particularly Ridges, up at
the Liquor Mart in Boulder. All three of these bottles came that route
and had gotten "lost" down in the depth's of John & Adele's crawl space
cum wine cellar. This dinner was an occasion to try some of these discoveries.
-
The '73 Coast Range was in absolutely marvelous shape for very much a "lesser"
Ridge Zinfandel. A little of the "old Zin" character but still some raspberry
fruit lurking in the background. This wine was released up at Liquor Mart
at $3.99/btl. We tasted it & liked it soooo much (high QPR in today's
lexicon) that we ordered a sh*tload (as we say in Kansas) of it from Liquor
Mart. I rented a U-Haul trailor and brought down some 70 case's worth from
Boulder. It put me on the map w/ the folks up at Ridge Vnyds (afore I'd
made my first of many visits there) as sombody down in NewMexico who was
a bit more than a little off-scale. I've done nothing since that time to
dispell that reputation up there. Ridge started producing in the '96 vintage
again the Coast Range Zin.... but priced around $15/btl. I complained like
bloody hell to Ridge marketing genuis Donn Riesen about the HUGE price
escalation over the previous Ridge Coast Range; but he seemed not at all
sympathetic to my grousing.
-
The '72 Lodi, made from one of Calif's "lesser" areas was likewise in remarkable
shape, considering it lack of pedigreed origins. I expected the wine to
be totally dead.... and it was not. Even after 27 yrs of age, that Lodi
character came thru load & clear in the wine.
-
This was the 3'rd time I've had the '73 Lytton Springs since the start
of the year (not like that it's becomming my house wine or anything) and
the only one drunk in a "recreational" context. The first one in late January
from Blair Swartz's cellar was rather on the tired & dried out side....
an "intellectual" experience. The 2'nd bottle, directly from the Ridge
archives, was beautiful/ complex in the nose but a bit too tired/dried-out
on the palate. This bottle was by far the best of the three and had an
amazing lushness and fruit still in both the nose and the palate; it was
a genuine pleasure to drink, a "sensual" experience AND an intelluctual
experience. And to think that some folks say that "Zinfandels can't age"!!
-
It should be noted the alcohol levels on all three of these wines.... well
below 13%. I don't recall the wines being particularly big or tannic or
acidic in their youth. Yet all three have lasted 25 plus yrs in very good
shape, thank you. I don't suppose there good be anything to this "balance"
thing when it comes to aging of wines, you suppose??
TomHill (heading off to bowling practice)
Return to the Tom Hill Archive Index |